Original Article
Comparison of Conventional 2.0 mm Non-Locking and Locking Miniplates in Management of Fracture Mandible
Year: 2018 | Month: June | Volume 5 | Issue 1
1.Champy M, Pape HD. The strasbourg miniplate osteosynthesis. In: Kruger E, Schilli W, editors. Oral and Maxillofacial Traumotology. Vol. 2. Berlin: Quintessence; 1986. p. 19-43.
View at Google Scholar2.Esen A, Dolanmaz D, Tüz HH. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: An experimental study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;50:e65-8.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED3.Suer BT, Kocyigit ID, Kaman S, Tuz HH, Tekin U, Atil F. Biomechanical evaluation of a new design titanium miniplate for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:841.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED4.Kimsal J, Baack B, Candelaria L, Khraishi T, Lovald S. Biomechanical analysis of mandibular angle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:3010-4.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED5.Ribeiro PD Jr., Magro-Filho O, Shastri KA, Papageorge MB. In vitro evaluation of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for the treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:1109-14.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED6.Chrcanovic BR. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: In vitro biomechanical assessments and computer-based studies. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;17:251-68
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED7.Atik F, Ataç MS, Özkan A, Kilinç Y, Arslan M. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures. Niger J Clin Pract 2016;19:386-90.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED8.Haug RH, Street CC, Goltz M. Does plate adaptation affect stability? A biomechanical comparison of locking and nonlocking plates. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1319-1326.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED9.Agarwal M, Mohammad S, Singh RK, Singh V. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing bite force in 2-mm locking plates versus 2-mm standard plates in treatment of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1995-2000.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED10.Chiodo TA, Ziccardi VB, Janal M, Sabitini C. Failure strength of 2.0 locking versus 2.0 conventional synthes mandibular plates: A laboratory model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1475-9.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED11.Collins CP, Pirinjian-Leonard G, Tolas A, Alcalde R. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing 2.0-mm locking plates to 2.0- mm standard plates in treatment of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1392-5
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED12.Singh V, Kumar I, Bhagol A. Comparative evaluation of 2.0-mm locking plate system vs. 2.0-mm nonlocking plate system for mandibular fracture: A prospective randomized study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:372-7.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED13.Jain MK. Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:156-72.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED14.Abotaleb BM, Al Moraissi E, Zhiqiang W, Ping C, Yongjie K, Alkebsi K, et al. A detailed analysis of mandibular fractures epidemiology, treatment and outcomes: A 5-year retrospective study, Gansu Province-China. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol 2018;30:197-205.
View at Google Scholar15.Sehgal S, Ramanujam L, Prasad K, Krishnappa R. Threedimensional v/s standard titanium miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures—a randomized clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:1292-9
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED16.Malhotra K, Sharma A, Giraddi G, Shahi AK. Versatility of titanium 3D plate in comparison with conventional titanium miniplate fixation for the management of mandibular fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012;11:284-90.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED17.Khalifa ME, El-Hawary HE, Hussein MM. Titanium three dimensional miniplate versus conventional titanium miniplate in fixation of anterior mandibular fractures. Life Sci J 2012;9:1006-10.
View at Google Scholar18.Sawatari Y, Marwan H, Alotaibi F, Christensen J, Gannon J, Peleg M. The use of three-dimensional strut plates for the management of mandibular angle fractures: A retrospective analysis of 222 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1410-7.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED19.Chritah A, Lazow SK, Berger JR. Transoral 2.0-mm locking miniplate fixation of mandibular fractures plus 1 week of maxillomandibular fixation: A prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1737-41.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED20.Balakrishnan R, Ebenezer V, Dakir A. Three dimensional titanium mini plates in management of mandibular fractures. Biomed Pharmacol J 2014;7:241-6
View at Google Scholar21.Cillo JE Jr., Ellis E IIIrd. Treatment of patients with double unilateral fractures of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1461-9.
View at Google Scholar View at PUBMED
